Saturday, October 31, 2026

Across the Universe

Updated 1 Nov 26

I have recently come across a couple of items online based on the elapsed time for occupants of a spaceship accelerating at 1g to traverse cosmic distances.

First a video, Something Terrifying Would Happen If a Spaceship Constantly Accelerated at 1G Through Space..., on YouTube channel ExoSci, posted 27 Sept. The audio refers to an article, but which? Could it be this one, How long does it take to travel through the Universe at 1g?, posted by Ethan Siegel on Big Think just the day before? Too soon surely, but perhaps Siegel had posted something similar earlier. Astonishingly, he concludes: All destinations within the reachable Universe are achievable in 25 years, maximum. Of course, that is for the occupants of the spaceship and is a consequence of relativistic length-contraction over the cosmic distance travelled.

For some reason, this made me remember an amazing fact I first came across many years' ago - if the Earth were to be squeezed as a cylinder of 1 square metre cross-section (maintaining its density), its length would equal the diameter of our galaxy! 

Let's check:

  • the radius of the Earth is 6.4 million metres
  • therefore its volume is ~ 10^21 cubic metres
  • with a cross-section of 1 square metre, the cylinder would have a length of 10^21 metres
  • one light year is about 10^16 metres, so that makes the squeezed Earth 100 thousand light years in length
  • our galaxy is believed to be 100 to 150 thousand light years across, so the assertion is roughly correct!

Why stop there? What if we were to reduce the cross-section of the cylinder to 1 square centimetre? There are 10,000 (100 squared) of those in a square metre, so the squeezed Earth would now be 10,000 times longer than before, so 1000 million, or 1 billion light years in length!

What if we were to reduce the cross-section of the cylinder further to just 1 square millimetre? There are 100 (10 squared) of those in a square centimetre, so the squeezed Earth would now be 100 times longer than before, so 100 billion light years in length! That's about the diameter of the observable universe!

(We could also dial back and increase the cross-section to 1 square kilometre, in which case, the cylinder would stretch to about one millionth the diameter of the Milky Way, i.e. to one tenth of a light year, about the distance from the Sun to the inner edge of the Oort Cloud).

Conclusion: the (observable) universe is vast, but not unimaginably vast. (And 'just' a million Milky Way galaxies placed side-by-side will span it).

Thursday, October 15, 2026

A 100-year-old crystal radio

Updated 27 Oct 26





Crystal radios are wonderful, able to pick up broadcasts without consuming energy. Old technology is cool, so that makes this antique crystal radio doubly so.

I was very kindly given it by a friend of my mother's. It had belonged to her grandparents and the (near pristine) licences that came with it are for 1923-24 (an interim licence costing 15 shillings) and 1924-25 (a receiving licence costing 10 shillings), both for an address in Balham and for 1929-30 (another receiving licence still costing 10 shillings) for an address in Merton Park, both in South London. 

That 15 shillings in 1923 is worth nearly £60 today. According to the weekly Popular Wireless magazine of 13th Oct. 1923, there was a deadline to register previously unlicenced radio sets (as they were, and sometimes are still, called), including home-made ones, by 15th Oct. - see here, page 10 - by means of the newly-introduced interim licence. On the document, it is described as a Licence to establish a receiving station and was presumably a one-off, standard receiving licences (also known as B.B.C. licences) being payable in subsequent years. (It seems that new home-made radio sets were to be covered by a newly-introduced constructor's licence, also costing 15 shillings).  I think we can deduce that the radio, whether manufactured or home-made, had been in use for a while and the licence, dated 9th Oct., was purchased with the deadline looming. The local radio station at the time was 2LO, set up by Marconi in 1922, but taken over by the newly-formed B.B.C. later that year. It broadcast from the Strand in London, so presumably reception was good just a few miles away in Balham. I suspect that the radio was bought in 1922 or '23 for the purpose of picking up that station for entertainment etc. and that the owners were early adopters of the new medium, albeit as consumers rather than hobbyists. 

The wooden chest looks to have been made by a competent wood-worker. A commercially-made case would likely have a manufacturer's mark and instructions and possibly licencing information as well and be varnished, while this one has neither mark nor text and is stained. In order to accommodate the controls, a deep flat-topped lid would have sufficed, but instead, the builder has opted for a pitched roof type of construction with semi-circles of wood over the 'gable ends', perhaps to give a first impression that the whole top is curved. The lid won't quite close now, but perhaps some adjustments to the hinges will fix that.

The panel is of a black plastic material (ebonite?) and has a typical layout for such radios of this period. It sits on a ledge in the cabinet and can be lifted out. There is no support in the middle and it has bowed downwards there a little over the years. The space below holds the coils and wiring attached to the underside of the panel and also serves as storage, in this case, for the licences already mentioned, and for the detecting crystals. There is no maker's mark on the panel either, but that seems to be typical even for the manufactured ones. It could have been sold as a kit, or perhaps as a fully-assembled item ready to be put into a cabinet. 

Detection is by means of a semi-conducting point contact between a wire - the cat's whisker - and a crystal (galena?). There are several crystals: two loose larger ones were in the storage compartment, as well as two boxes: one small, marked Talite at the base, containing several small crystals, and one larger, empty, marked Eiffel Tower Brand. 

(It's funny to think that while the crystal detector soon gave way to the diode valve detector, a few decades later this in turn gave way to the crystal detector once more, albeit in a smaller, packaged format, as can be confirmed by looking at a later germanium diode with a magnifying glass. The big advantage with the new types of detecting diode was that it was no longer necessary to adjust the cat's whisker wire, or to try different crystals, in order to get a radio to detect optimally. Indeed, when I made a crystal radio in the 1970s, once the diode/detector was installed, it wasn't given a second's thought).

Tuning is via two controls: one at right  (coarse tuning), which selects various tapping points on the main coil and one at left (fine tuning) which turns a second coil placed at the end of and just within the main coil. I believe this is known as a variometer. Thus the radio is tuned by changing its inductance, unlike later types that were tuned by varying the capacitance.

The tuning knob at left is missing and was presumably the same as the one at right. The pillars on which these were mounted have screw-threads and are 3/16 inches in diameter. I've not been able to remove the knob at right. If it was screwed down onto the pillar, it would surely have had to have been secured by glue, but since thread-locking glue seems to be a more recent invention, I'm rather puzzled.

Interestingly, the output terminals are marked TELEPHONES rather than HEADPHONES. From the copy of Popular Wireless mentioned above, this seems to have been a common alternative term at the time. Indeed, in the first edition of the magazine in June 1922, it refers to the national wireless telephony broadcasting scheme about to begin operations! Presumably this description was an adaptation of that of so-called wireless telegraphy for Morse code over radio, but really it is better applied to today's mobile phone network.

Also present are two stranded cables, one coated in fabric and the other in a sort of rubber which is now crumbling a little. Both still conduct electricity. Neither is more than about one and a half yards in length and they were presumably for connecting the set to terminals a short distance away, possibly indoors, for aerial and ground.

I have tested it, although with a far shorter aerial than it deserves. For comparison, I used the same aerial and ground connections with a more recent educational crystal radio, by Maxitronix. There are no headphones and as I no longer have working crystal earpieces, output was to a high-gain LM 386-based amplifier and a speaker. With the Maxitronix, I was able to choose from three points to connect the aerial to optimize reception. During the afternoon, both radios were swamped by presumably Far Eastern stations, some/one of which were in English. I think this may be because the metal-framed window in the room pulls in these stations. IIRC, I've picked up these stations before - some may even have been short-wave ones. The antique was much the quieter of the two radios. On the Maxitronix, I was also able to pick up BBC Radio 5 Live at reasonable volume. At night, I was able to pick up this station on both radios, but the antique radio was again far quieter. On this radio, getting a good working contact between cat's whisker and crystal could be a little tricky. Also, sometimes the radio went silent and playing with the cat's whisker made no difference. I don't know if this was because of poor contacts elsewhere, or because of incompatibility with the amplifier, or a combination of both. I would have liked to have bypassed the detector with a germanium diode to compare performance, but there is no suitable mounting point and even if I had found one, no doubt getting a good connection would have been a problem.

It's impressive that such an old radio still works today, even if it is on the quiet side! No doubt, if I stripped it down, cleaned all the contacts, re-soldered the connections and attached a longer aerial, performance would be far improved. However, I think it's better to keep it in original condition as far as possible and just display it. And as AM radio stations are in terminal decline, in Europe at least, there also seems little point. Perhaps, I could clean the brass though...

According to an article How to Make a Loud Speaker in the third edition of Popular Wireless magazine, for shared listening, a second pair of headphones could be added (in series) to a radio. Alternatively, if close enough to the transmitting station, a telephone earpiece could be pushed against the soundbox of a gramophone player and the sound could then be heard from its horn, albeit quietly, all without amplification! This radio could therefore have seen many years of useful service, as is suggested by the presence of a licence for 1929-30. At some point though, an all-in-one valve set, being simpler to use and not needing a long* aerial, would have been increasingly difficult to resist and so the old radio would have been consigned to an attic or basement, perhaps.

*In the first edition of Popular Wireless magazine, there is an article on constructing an outdoor aerial, which is obviously aimed at users of crystal receivers in the main, but seems to suggest that owners of valve radios could also benefit. However, since valve radios could likely receive well enough for most listeners with just an indoor aerial, I suspect that in most cases, only if an outdoor aerial like this had already been constructed for use with a crystal receiver, would it have been connected to a valve receiver. The article says: For the best results the aerial should be a fair height from the ground - say, not less than 40 feet, whilst its overall length, in order to comply with the Post Office regulations, must not exceed 100 feet. It also says: for practical purposes 100 feet of wire will suit the average amateur quite well to begin with! (The exclamation mark is mine, btw). If there wasn't space for a full 100 foot length aerial, then the article says: a twin aerial is a good alternative... In this case 140 feet of wire may be used, although it's not clear to me where that number comes from. That 40 foot height wouldn't have been possible for a typical two-storey house, 25 feet maximum being more realistic, if the aerial was to be run from the top of the chimney, as shown in the article with photos of a determined-looking chap doing just that, with no hard hat and a pipe clenched between his teeth! Even then, it would have been easier and a little safer to run it lower still from the eaves, as shown in the 1970s Ladybird book making a Transistor Radio, which has a section on crystal radios. 

Monday, October 12, 2026

The LGP-30: a 70-year-old mini computer

Updated 13 Oct 26

This early small digital computer (introduced in 1956) and its manufacturer, Librascope, have somehow escaped my notice until just recently, following the widely-reported death of pioneering software engineer Margaret Hamilton, whose first work with computers was on one of these machines at MIT, as she recounts here. Nor did I know that such small-scale computers existed so early on!

Of particular note: it has drum (not ferrite core) memory comprising 4096 words of 31 bits each (so, 124k bits equivalent to 15.5k bytes in modern computing); uses solid-state diode logic, but also vacuum tubes; has just 15 flip-flops; has built-in multiplication and uses an oscilloscope to display information about its registers.

Also, of interest to me, is that its designer, Stan Frankel, whose work on the Manhattan Project sparked his interest in electronic computation, also designed the Combitron desktop programmable calculator by Diehl of Germany, (almost certainly) the first programmable machine that I ever worked on.

Source: wikipedia


Friday, October 9, 2026

SAP-1 Simulator

Updated 10 Oct 26

I wrote a while ago about a home-built 8-bit computer, the SAP-1, with an example of a simple program to add together the contents of two memory addresses.

I was thinking about this again earlier today and wondering if anyone had written a simulation of the machine. Well, I've found one of sorts here, where ones for the SAP-2 and for a Turing Machine can also be found.

Why 'of sorts'? Because it's high-level, so we don't get to see the microcode beneath the instructions. This also means you can't add to the instruction set (something that can be done on the original machine), so unfortunately there's no support for looping (jump) nor for logic (conditional jump), both of which are really essential requirements.

Here's a simulation of that program mentioned earlier, with the decimal values 28 in address 14 and 14 in address 15 and the output decimal 42 after running it. (I'm not sure about the decimal 14 in the accumulator though). See the first link above for a detailed breakdown of the microcode steps involved.

Thursday, October 8, 2026

Heavy breathing from the woods!

More strange noises to report! They are like this and come from nearby woods at night. They have been heard on many occasions - quite un-nerving the first time! Presumed to be made by stags as there are deer there. No specific time of year, as I have several recordings dated January to June.

(The recording may be on the quiet side if played online, in which case, download it and try again).

Nocturnal screeching!

Recording made around 11 pm towards the end of June this year, just one of several occasions when there have been these screeching sounds outside our house. I don't recall seeing anything, perhaps just catching the occasional fluttering as well. I'd heard such sounds in previous years and had always thought that they were made by bats, while also being fully aware that their echo-location uses ultrasound. Once disabused of the notion that bats also make audible sounds, I surmized that these must have been made by birds instead, but which ones? I was amazed that the BirdNET app identified them as from Tawny Owls! We often hear typical owl hoots, living close to several woods. Almost certainly though, these sounds are made by owlets calling out to be fed.

(The recording may be on the quiet side if played online, in which case, download it and try again).

Non-magnetic stainless steel!

I hate to throw out old motors etc. without first trying to retrieve parts like wire or magnets. The item I was attempting to dismantle was an old water pump for a garden water feature. It was completely sealed and looked to be difficult to break into, so I didn't try, but I did save a magnet which was outside the main body. It was dirty, so I washed it and then placed it onto the draining board section of a stainless steel sink. I expected it to snap into place, but nothing happened, which was a great surprise! It turns out that the crystalline structure of austenitic stainless steel renders it non-magnetic. Amazing to have discovered something so basic so late in life!